hi !
I'm a student of IT and I need to install ActiveMQ for Fedora Core 5. So
far I've been unsuccessful, I need the installation procedure step-by-step
and fast!
thanks,
Harikrishnan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/installation-problems-tf3153644.html#a8744836
Sent f
Please post what you did and what went wrong.
harbhai wrote:
hi !
I'm a student of IT and I need to install ActiveMQ for Fedora Core 5. So
far I've been unsuccessful, I need the installation procedure step-by-step
and fast!
thanks,
Harikrishnan
Hi Lalit,
I could tell from the code that you were using the 1.0 version of
activemq-cpp. The new code uses cms::Destination objects on the get/set
CMSReplyTo methods. Please give the latest trunk a try.
BTW, svn has been moved. You can get the latest trunk here
https://svn.apache.org/repos/as
All i am trying to put in a string property on my published messages that i
can group messages together, so that when messages come into the receiver i
can check what type of message it is, and filter on them.
When i try this i get this error.
Message message = null;
You could also write an Interceptor to block (or reject) inbound
messages from being sent if the queue is too big.
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/interceptors.html
On 1/31/07, itayke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is something I don't understand:
In here
http://incubator.apache.org/ac
Hi,
My previous message didn't get any feedback.
Today, I tried several other settings and seem to get good results with
durable=true (sets delivery mode to persistent). However it seems that in
some cases I get duplicate messages.
I'll investigate more...
Any help from people that tested a simi
Could there be something wrong with the C#/.NET release in the HEAD of SVN?
Shouldn't there be some stable tag or branch that I need to check out?
sparky2708 wrote:
>
> A few days ago I checked out the latest C#/.NET code using svn as per the
> instructions on the website. I built the code with
On 1/31/07, elliottjf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm attempting to use the "consumer.exclusive=true" destination option
against a cluster of brokers, but it's appearing that consumers attached to
different brokers are not getting excluded from each other. Is this
expected behavior, or ar
I replied to this in the same thread on the dev list
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Does-ActiveMQ-4.2-client-jar-support-Java-1.4--p8747757.html
On 1/31/07, Miing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've read in the developers' forum that release 4.2 will require Java 5 to
run.
Will it be the same f
On 1/30/07, Nilantha Jayalath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rob,
Thank you for the response and your time.
Actually my main worry is what happens if my journal files are lost due
to a hardware failure before moving messages into the long term store.
Then you are hosed. If you cannot rely on loc
This question was answered in the other thread you raised
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-JDBC-persistance-in-AMQ-4.1.0-p8718202.html
On 1/30/07, Nilantha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am testing JDBC persistence with one broker and my "persistenceAdapter'
configuration is as follows,
On 1/30/07, igah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that's precisely what i was looking for. thanks!
now the naming convention seems a little bit odd. if i have
arbitrary/fixed/predefined names for topic and queues (say foo and bar), can
i link them up?
You can explicitly configure in the activemq.xm
On 1/26/07, cafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
no, I can't because the client request to the server inside a MessageListener
and when the method onMessage end the execution the temporary queue is
destroyed.
Not quite. A temporary destination is only destroyed when the
connection which created it
Thank you James,
-Nilantha
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:38 AM
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: JDBC persistance in AMQ 4.1.0
On 1/30/07, Nilantha Jayalath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> T
Did some more debugging and narrowed down the problem:
in WireFormatNegotiator the "command" is sometimes "Null" -- not sure why it
happens or how to fix it except to protect the following statement:
protected override void OnCommand(ITransport sender, Command command)
{
i
Protecting it doesn't work. This is probably some part of the protocol so I
can't just make that change. Ok, I guess at this point I am stuck.
sparky2708 wrote:
>
> Did some more debugging and narrowed down the problem:
>
> in WireFormatNegotiator the "command" is sometimes "Null" -- not sure
Hello.
The subscribe address on http://www.activemq.org/site/mailing-lists.html
is still the old one.
Regards,
cyrille
Joe Schaefer a écrit :
This list has moved to
users@activemq.apache.org
The old address still works,
but from this point forward
you should use the new one.
I am using Sprin's DefaultMessageListenerContainer to consume messages.
What I noticed was "maximumRedeliveries" setting is not effective for
some reason. It just keeps redelivering messages.
Following is my connectionFactory setting.
According to the ActiveMQ documentation it seems a "Poison ack
On 1/29/07, cafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually those questions are opposite to my point. Let mi tell you:
My app need to send files (over 300mg) to different clients (over 100
clients in different PC) so I need only a strategy for sending and receiving
these files. Now my questions are:
1-
I'd certainly recommend never using the
org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory for anything other
than sending messages with Spring's JmsTemplate as described here
http://activemq.apache.org/spring-support.html
am not sure if thats causing the issue or not.
If not it could be a Spring
On 1/26/07, saleem145 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to build a very simple finance application. I would like to use
a message bus to broadcast stock prices. The publisher would connect to an
exchange, get the prices and publish them onto the message bus. The
subscribers would co
On 1/25/07, Darryl Bowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are they any issues with ActiveMQ and this years extended daylight saving
time?
None that I'm aware of
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
It looks like the property is not being sent. Typically when you
receive a message its meant to be read only - and you are generally
meant to create a new message for sending.
It could be that there is a bug when you try mutating a message and
then sending it on. (A JUnit test case proving this f
On 1/25/07, magic.moose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
AMQ4.1.0, Jencks, Spring 1.2.7.
Prefetch size for all queues is always 10. I tried to CHANGE it in many
places:
- in broker url (both in conf xml and embedded into connectionFactory).
- in activationSpec destination name.
- in xml config
On 1/31/07, Jeff Gunther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with ActiveMQ's support of JXTA?
I tinkered with it a while back; it depends on the use of JXTA's P2PSocket stuff
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/sandbox/jxta/
but needs a bit of love to get back in s
James Strachan wrote:
> I'd certainly recommend never using the
> org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory for anything other
> than sending messages with Spring's JmsTemplate as described here
> http://activemq.apache.org/spring-support.html
>
> am not sure if thats causing the issue or n
this keeps occurring in our log, any thoughts/suggestions?
ERROR JournalPersistenceAdapter - Failed to checkpoint a message store:
edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
java.io.IOException: Not started.
edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurrent.ExecutionEx
Fair point. One thing which should help now is that we're now a top
level project (http://activemq.apache.org) so the ActiveMQ PMC can do
a single vote to make a release - rather than a 2 stage thing with the
Incubator stuff which hopefully will mean less work & faster turn
around time of releases
Probably this would help...
Try setting
if you have set
as "true" in your data source configuration.
see
http://www.nabble.com/DB-connection-pool-tf2775515.html for more
details. This resolved few issues I had including this "failed to
checkpoint"
-Nilantha
-Original Message-
From: pt
FYI
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:58 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: No effect on maximumRedeliveries setting
I'd certainly recommend never using the
org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory fo
Just FYI, C# .NET Development is not possible at this point with ActiveMQ C#
NMS Client as establishing a connection will fatally crash the client (see
JIRA). Please, please, please address this issue ASAP as this is a show
stopper for all of us that are trying to use ActiveMQ across different
pla
sparky2708 wrote:
> Just FYI, C# .NET Development is not possible at this point with ActiveMQ C#
> NMS Client as establishing a connection will fatally crash the client (see
> JIRA). Please, please, please address this issue ASAP as this is a show
> stopper for all of us that are trying to use Acti
I'm doing some simple communication between two peers via a Queue, and I'm
noticing odd persistence behavior.
Even though both the producer is set with DeliveryMode.NON_PERSISTENT, what
I see happen is this:
1) Bring up AMQ broker
2) Bring up Producer and send 5 test messages. At this point the
Persistence v non persistence only applies to what happens to messages
if you reboot the broker; otherwise the semantics are pretty similar.
If you don't want a message to be sent to consumers which are not
there, don't use a queue, use a topic.
On 2/1/07, GaryG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm
When you use a queue connection , irrespective of other settings,
message delivery is guaranteed.
When you use a topic connection , message delivery is guaranteed only
when the delivery mode is persistent and the subscriber is durable.
Suchitha.
-Original Message-
From: GaryG [mailto:[E
Please read about queueing and durable subscriptions from the following
link
http://java.sun.com/products/jms/tutorial/1_3_1-fcs/doc/basics.html
-Original Message-
From: GaryG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:49 AM
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
S
I am using two embedded brokers on two nodes and using a network
connector to link them. I thought I had configured AMQ to NOT use the
journal, but now I can start one broker just fine, but when I start
the second, I get a JournalLockedException, which does not impact the
functioning of the
Just a thought
Check whether the broker names are identical. I saw something like that
as a response to a similar issue.
-Nilantha
-Original Message-
From: William Blackburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 4:47 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Networ
Hello activemq users ,
In my project we'll be using durable subscriptions. Is
there any example or code sample which explains the usage of durable
subscriptions using active mq ?
please let me know,
thanks,
Suchitha.
Has anyone who is experiencing this problem also see in it in the 4.1.0
snapshot ?
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/4.1-incubator-SNAPSHOT/
YoungSoul wrote:
>
>
> I see this frequently - and I just can't believe that others are not
> ei
41 matches
Mail list logo
