ssage in context:
http://www.nabble.com/thread-deadlock-issue-in-NMS-tp20180687p20270315.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ion to share the connection. For testing, I might
> switch it back to one-connection-per-consumer and see if that changes the
> behavior we're observing.
>
> It might be a week or two before I can spend significant time on this due to
> other priorities.
> --
> View this
.
It might be a week or two before I can spend significant time on this due to
other priorities.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/thread-deadlock-issue-in-NMS-tp20180687p20227395.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
system. My "consumers" are straight PONO classes which have a method
that is invoked by a listener container when a new message is available.
I can't really answer your question as I'm not *directly* using connections,
sessions, consumers.
--
View this message in context:
htt
hen jstack does not respond
(process is hung)
-m to print both java and native frames (mixed mode)
-l long listing. Prints additional information about locks
-h or -help to print this help message
Hans
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/thread-deadlock-issue
get the debugger on it I see several threads are parked
> in synchronized sections of the NMS library.
>
> I know that's not enough for you to work from but I wanted to give you a
> heads up. I'll post more details once I have them.
> --
> View this message in context:
&
ut I wanted to give you a
> heads up. I'll post more details once I have them.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/thread-deadlock-issue-in-NMS-tp20180687p20180687.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
ils once I have them.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/thread-deadlock-issue-in-NMS-tp20180687p20180687.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
