@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]:Re: Window-Based Flow Control Performance Question
[CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.]
Window
Friday, March 18, 2022 6:04 PM
> To: asteigerw...@brandesassociates.com.invalid
> Cc: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL]:Re: Window-Based Flow Control Performance Question
>
> [CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
: Window-Based Flow Control Performance Question
[CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.]
By "improve message throughput perfor
By "improve message throughput performance" are you talking about *overall*
message throughput or throughput for a few selected consumers?
Generally speaking, reducing consumerWindowSize will help when messages are
accumulating on one consumer and other consumers have none (i.e. consumer
starvatio
Hello,
Does it make sense that setting consumerWindowSize=0 on the client's connection
URL in order to disable client message buffering would improve message
throughput performance given the following scenario:
Artemis version: 2.3.0
Number of queue consumers: 8 from 8 different systems, some o
