Re: ]: RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed

2017-11-16 Thread Tim Bain
Francois, I have two apologize, I've misled you on two fronts. First, I had wrongly assumed that setting persistent=false on the broker resulted in setting persistent=false on the incoming messages, but based on the information in your logs I took a look into the code (specifically BrokerService.

RE: ]: RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed

2017-11-16 Thread COURTAULT Francois
it is set to unlimited, right ? Best Regards. -Original Message- From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain Sent: jeudi 16 novembre 2017 06:39 To: ActiveMQ Users Subject: Re: ]: RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed Francois, I think you're misun

Re: ]: RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed

2017-11-15 Thread Tim Bain
limits, right ? > > Best Regards. > > -Original Message----- > From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain > Sent: jeudi 9 novembre 2017 06:17 > To: ActiveMQ Users > Subject: Re: [++SPAM++]: RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed > >

RE: ]: RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed

2017-11-13 Thread COURTAULT Francois
Tim Bain Sent: jeudi 9 novembre 2017 06:17 To: ActiveMQ Users Subject: Re: [++SPAM++]: RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:29 AM, COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@gemalto.com> wrote: > Hello Tim, > > Understood for the temp store: it lo

Re: [++SPAM++]: RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed

2017-11-08 Thread Tim Bain
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:29 AM, COURTAULT Francois < francois.courta...@gemalto.com> wrote: > Hello Tim, > > Understood for the temp store: it looks like a swap mechanism in case > there is no more room in memory, right ? > Just to clarify: it's a swap mechanism in case there is no more room in *

RE: [++SPAM++]: RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed

2017-11-08 Thread COURTAULT Francois
gards. -Original Message- From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain Sent: mercredi 8 novembre 2017 14:48 To: ActiveMQ Users Subject: [++SPAM++]: RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed The quick summary is that the temp store is used when the memory store is full

RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed

2017-11-08 Thread Tim Bain
Message- > From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain > Sent: mardi 7 novembre 2017 14:42 > To: ActiveMQ Users > Subject: [+SPAM+]: Re: WARNING log message to be removed > > That warning is about the temp store, not the persistence store, and the &

RE: : Re: WARNING log message to be removed

2017-11-07 Thread COURTAULT Francois
ersistence set to false. Best Regards. -Original Message- From: tbai...@gmail.com [mailto:tbai...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Bain Sent: mardi 7 novembre 2017 14:42 To: ActiveMQ Users Subject: [+SPAM+]: Re: WARNING log message to be removed That warning is about the temp store, not the p

Re: WARNING log message to be removed

2017-11-07 Thread Tim Bain
That warning is about the temp store, not the persistence store, and the disk location being used for it isn't big enough for it. It's a valid message that's pointing out a problem in your specific environment, which you should do something about. And no, we will not be removing it. But if you thi

WARNING log message to be removed

2017-11-07 Thread COURTAULT Francois
Hello everyone, I had some exchanges, in the TomEE users mailing list, about a WARNING message which appears even if the PersistenceAdpater is set to a MemoryPersistenceAdpater. Indeed, I have the following message, in the TomEE startup log: 01-Nov-2017 14:16:38.360 WARNING [ActiveMQFactory s