On 28/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be glad to join the group and help out...
> what does it take to join?
So we love patches :)
http://activemq.apache.org/camel/contributing.html
and the camel-extra project we can add committers pretty easily.
http://code.googl
I would be glad to join the group and help out...
what does it take to join?
-- Original message --
From: "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 27/02/2008, jimmy Zhang wrote:
> > Yes, when designing VTD-XML we took a long hard look at JAXP...
> > the conclusion is
On 27/02/2008, jimmy Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, when designing VTD-XML we took a long hard look at JAXP...
> the conclusion is that JAXP simply has too many issues... the problem starts
> from the DOM API (which I have written an article on this topic called
> the performance woe
ebruary 26, 2008 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: VTD-XML 2.3
On 26/02/2008, jimmy Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My take (which I am going publish articles shortly) is that VTD-XML
is vastly superior to JAXP in routing/switching XML payloads...
JAXP is just an API for XPath. I don't see why
On 26/02/2008, jimmy Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My take (which I am going publish articles shortly) is that VTD-XML
> is vastly superior to JAXP in routing/switching XML payloads...
JAXP is just an API for XPath. I don't see why VTD-XML can't implement
that API - it'd make it really easy
We have had a white paper on VTD-XML from a long time ago
I thought readers of this list may interested
http://www.ximpleware.com/wp_SUN.pdf
- Original Message -
From: "jimmy Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: VTD-XM
, if you look under the hood, the
techcal
savvy subscrber of this list will agree with me that JAXP (DOM/SAX) is
fundamentally
broken...
- Original Message -
From: "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: VTD-XML 2.
com/p/camel-extra/
Does VTD-XML support the JAXP XPath API? Or any plans to? :) It'd
certainly make it a bit easier to integrate, but its not essential.
On 25/02/2008, jimmy Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> VTD-XML 2.3 (http://vtd-xml.sf.net) is now released. To download the lates
VTD-XML 2.3 (http://vtd-xml.sf.net) is now released. To download the latest
version please visit
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=110612&package_id=1201
72.
Below is a list of new features and enhancements in this version.
* VTDException is now introduced as the
