Hi guys,
We have a single broker test setup that is used by clients to retrieve data
from servers using a request-response pattern i.e.;
1) Client creates TempQueue
2) Client publishes messages on Topic with JMSReplyTo = TempQueue
3) Server consumes messages
4) Server creates dedicated message pub
an Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
>> >
>> > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
>> > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 a
m/
> > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Kalpana Jalawadi <
> > kalpana.jalaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Could
gt; Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Kalpana Jalawadi <
> kalpana.jalaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>> Could anybody post a code snippet for acquiring a connection & session
>> over
>> a FailoverTranspor
alpana Jalawadi <
kalpana.jalaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Could anybody post a code snippet for acquiring a connection & session over
> a FailoverTransport.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Using-Failov
Hi,
Could anybody post a code snippet for acquiring a connection & session over
a FailoverTransport.
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Using-FailoverTransport-tp28338986p28338986.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
liseconds)
> without
> interruption of reconnection process
>
>But this option was not supported in ActiveMQ 5.2.0.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-specify--%22send-timeout%22-when-using-FailoverTransport--tp22551233p22551233.h
miliseconds)
without
interruption of reconnection process
But this option was not supported in ActiveMQ 5.2.0.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-specify--%22send-timeout%22-when-using-FailoverTransport--tp22551233p22551233.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
61626,tcp://localhost:61636
components[2] == tcp://localhost:61636
This fails downstream because the port number cannot be parsed.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ-using-FailoverTransport-tp21303879p21833315.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
k;and when
> the broker start up,the client application will continue.
>The conclusion is that the broker uri list in failover transport must be
> bracketed even when there is only one uri.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ-using-Fail
the client application will blok;and when
the broker start up,the client application will continue.
The conclusion is that the broker uri list in failover transport must be
bracketed even when there is only one uri.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Apache.NMS.Acti
unning.Is this a correct
> using for failoverTransport?If so,what's wrong with my code above?
>
> thanks
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ-using-FailoverTransport-tp21303879p21750420.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ-using-FailoverTransport-tp21303879p21303879.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
13 matches
Mail list logo
