Re: UDP buffer problem

2007-06-22 Thread James Strachan
On 6/22/07, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So we need a working reliable layer on top of UDP which is capable of > handling re-requests of missing packets etc. The current code is work ... I think that is called TCP. Why UDP at

Re: UDP buffer problem

2007-06-21 Thread Tom Samplonius
- "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So we need a working reliable layer on top of UDP which is capable of > handling re-requests of missing packets etc. The current code is work ... I think that is called TCP. Why UDP at all? Is this for multicasting? Otherwise, I can't see

Re: UDP buffer problem

2007-06-20 Thread James Strachan
t > find how to change the udp transport buffer size ) > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/UDP-buffer-problem-tf3899903s2354.html#a11225458 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- James --- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Re: UDP buffer problem

2007-06-20 Thread Jiang
size or maybe it can changed through > activemq.xml ? (When connection is created by connectionfactory I don't > find how to change the udp transport buffer size ) > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/UDP-buffer-problem-tf3899903s2354.html#a11225458 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

UDP buffer problem

2007-06-10 Thread Jiang
context: http://www.nabble.com/UDP-buffer-problem-tf3899903s2354.html#a11055860 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.