Re: Transaction State

2008-05-02 Thread Rob Bugh
Forgot to mention the test was run on ActiveMQ v4.1.1 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Transaction-State-tp16968998s2354p17028108.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Transaction State

2008-05-02 Thread Rob Bugh
1:1:2], value=prop_value_2:1209756576693 [consumer-1] Fri May 02 14:31:49 CDT 2008: Committing transaction... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Transaction-State-tp16968998s2354p17026701.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Transaction State

2008-04-30 Thread Rob Bugh
ts the transaction? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Transaction-State-tp16968998s2354p16986567.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Transaction State

2008-04-30 Thread Rob Davies
this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Transaction-State-tp16968998s2354p16968998.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Transactional state is replayed from the client - so the new master will remove the message from the store cheers, Rob

Transaction State

2008-04-29 Thread Rob Bugh
s now the new master) know about the transaction? What happens when the client attempts to commit the transaction? Is an error thrown or does the new master handle it properly, i.e., removes the message permanently from the queue? Rob -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Transa