7;ve entered this in JIRA under Test Cases. The title is "Transacted
> Messages not Committed".
>
> Thanks,
> -Frank
>
>
> Gary Tully wrote:
>>
>> Hi Frank,
>> it is great to have a test case. Could you create a jira issue[1] for
>> this
Hi Gary,
I've entered this in JIRA under Test Cases. The title is "Transacted
Messages not Committed".
Thanks,
-Frank
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> Hi Frank,
> it is great to have a test case. Could you create a jira issue[1] for
> this and attach your tests case wit
e are using the
>>>> default
>>>> AMQ message store.
>>>>
>>>> I've pored over the documentation, these forums, and google results and
>>>> have
>>>> not come up with a diagnosis. I have observed and read up on
if you're using a prefetch size of > 0 then a session rollback
>>> will
>>> block any additional consumption of messages by that session until the
>>> original problematic message is committed or sent to the dead letter
>>> queue.
>>> How
inal problematic message is committed or sent to the dead letter
>> queue.
>> However, this is not the same behavior as none of the messages are rolled
>> back. For now I've changed the consumers to use client acknowledge and
>> that
>> wor
ld really like to use transacted sessions if possible.
>
> Thanks,
> -Frank
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Transacted-Messages-Not-Committed-tp21615994p21615994.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source SOA
http://FUSESource.com
o use client acknowledge and that
works, but we would really like to use transacted sessions if possible.
Thanks,
-Frank
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Transacted-Messages-Not-Committed-tp21615994p21615994.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
