;>>>>
>>>>>> Which of the following approaches would be better for performance,
>>>>>> and why:
>>>>>> - Send the xml as TextMessages.
>>>>>> - Convert the xml to bytes, and then send the bytes as
>>>>>>
stion is, "Does ActiveMQ's implementation
of
TextMessages optimize the transmission of TextMessages by
compressing the
content somehow?"
Thanks in advance! Thank you Rob for the quick reply last time
too!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/TextMessage-vs-ByteMe
:
>>>> - Send the xml as TextMessages.
>>>> - Convert the xml to bytes, and then send the bytes as ByteMessages.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps my underlying question is, "Does ActiveMQ's implementation
>>>> of
>>>> TextMessages optimize th
st time too!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/TextMessage-vs-ByteMessage-tp16755490s2354p16755490.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'd use TextMessage - ActiveMQ converts the text into a binary format
to transfer on-the-wire anyway
I
>
>
>
> I'd use TextMessage - ActiveMQ converts the text into a binary format
> to transfer on-the-wire anyway
> If you'd like compression to be used - you need to enable the
> useCompression property on your ActiveMQConnectionFactory
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
&
u Rob for the quick reply last time too!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/TextMessage-vs-ByteMessage-tp16755490s2354p16755490.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'd use TextMessage - ActiveMQ converts the text into a binary format
message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/TextMessage-vs-ByteMessage-tp16755490s2354p16755490.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
