sked to do it
again during a reconnect.
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
Internet
gary.tu...@gmail.com
22/06/2010 17:40
Please respond to
users@activemq.apache.org
To
users@activemq.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Temporary queues and a WAN
The choice of tempQ vs replyQ comes down to the need for
mmon way of doing
> client-server request-response despite the advice from the ActiveMQ web
> page. H.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrew Marlow
>
>
>
>
> Internet
> ivan.pecho...@gmail.com
> 22/06/2010 16:23
> Please respond to
> users@activemq.apache.org
ivan.pecho...@gmail.com
22/06/2010 16:23
Please respond to
users@activemq.apache.org
To
users@activemq.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Temporary queues and a WAN
2010/6/22 :
> As per the advice at
>
http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-implement-request-response-with-jms.html
> I am using
2010/6/22 :
> As per the advice at
> http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-implement-request-response-with-jms.html
> I am using temporary Qs for my replies.
> ...
>
> Because of various technical obstacles that I wont go into here, I am only
> able to run with ActiveMQ locally. ActiveMQ is fine
As per the advice at
http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-implement-request-response-with-jms.html
I am using temporary Qs for my replies. But I think there is a problem. I
am programming to an abstract interface of mine that I designed so that I
can switch between activeMQ-cpp and IBM MQSe
