Re: Static network of brokers with not all brokers running (expected)

2018-02-02 Thread Tim Bain
Are you looking to use the discovery transport for the client connections, or both? I've never used it, but my understanding is that discovery is like failover (connect to one broker in this list) rather than like static (connect to all the brokers in this list), so it would be reasonable to use on

Re: Static network of brokers with not all brokers running (expected)

2018-01-31 Thread pypen
Thank Tim. I thought maybe the way I phrased the questions came across offensive or something. And thanks for the clarification about the polling vs. broadcasting. I will have to see if we can maybe enable multicast. I don't see the "backup" property on the discovery transport though and I am not

Re: Static network of brokers with not all brokers running (expected)

2018-01-31 Thread Tim Bain
On Jan 30, 2018 2:20 PM, "pypen" wrote: Bad day? Relax Tim. Not trying to offend anyone here. I wasn't intending for the response to come across sharply; sorry that it did. It's not about me not wanting to tweak the log4j. I just didn't want to suppress the TransportDisposedIOException (or Dem

Re: Static network of brokers with not all brokers running (expected)

2018-01-30 Thread pypen
Bad day? Relax Tim. Not trying to offend anyone here. It's not about me not wanting to tweak the log4j. I just didn't want to suppress the TransportDisposedIOException (or DemandForwardingBridgeSupport) if it happens for a different reason. And I was not clear enough about the previous versions: I

Re: Static network of brokers with not all brokers running (expected)

2018-01-30 Thread Tim Bain
For #1, if I'm reading your log right, it's coming out at INFO, and you said it used to be WARN. So you're saying we lowered the logging level; where's the problem? And either way, I'm not seeing why you're trying to avoid tweaking your Log4J configuration. You have a non-standard environment (one

Re: Static network of brokers with not all brokers running (expected)

2018-01-30 Thread pypen
Figured out the problem with 2. The client had a network timeout of 30 seconds. Every producer and consumer creates its own connection and session and that caused the problems. Reducing the timeout solved issue 2. -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Static network of brokers with not all brokers running (expected)

2018-01-30 Thread pypen
Hi, I have a network of 4 brokers, statically configured (). Each broker has a list if IPs, excluding its own. It is expected that not all brokers are running at the same time (they can, but don't have to). I have (java) clients that run on the same machines as the brokers and connect to their loca

Re: Static Network of brokers

2007-11-27 Thread ttmdev
olderConfigurer"/> > > xmlns="http://activemq.org/config/1.0";> > > > jmxDomainName="org.apache.activemq"/> > > > > > > > > > > uri="static://(tcp://wilson_laptop:61616,tcp://wilson_vm:61616)" >

Re: Static Network of brokers

2007-11-27 Thread Koka
.org/config/1.0";> Koka wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm trying to set up a static network of brokers. my config xml looks like > this: > > > > class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer"/> &

Re: Static Network of brokers

2007-11-27 Thread hbruch
ory - Journal is locked... waiting 10 > seconds f or the journal to be > unlocked. > > The broker tries to start itself twice, hence the lock. Any idea why this > is happening? > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Static-Network-of-brokers-tf4863557s2354.html#a13969477 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Static Network of brokers

2007-11-26 Thread ttmdev
che.org/activemq/ > INFO NetworkConnector - Establishing network connection > between f rom vm:?network=true to > tcp://comfsd001:61616 > INFO faultPersistenceAdapterFactory - Journal is locked... waiting 10 > seconds f

Re: Static Network of brokers

2007-11-26 Thread James Strachan
kConnector - Establishing network connection > between f rom vm:?network=true to > tcp://comfsd001:61616 > INFO faultPersistenceAdapterFactory - Journal is locked... waiting 10 > seconds f or the journal to be > unlocked. &

Re: Static Network of brokers

2007-11-26 Thread Koka
faultPersistenceAdapterFactory - Journal is locked... waiting 10 seconds f or the journal to be unlocked. The broker tries to start itself twice, hence the lock. Any idea why this is happening? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Static-Network-of

Re: Static Network of brokers

2007-11-26 Thread ttmdev
r have a different broker name? >> >> On Nov 23, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Koka wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm trying to set up a static network of brokers. my config xml >>> looks like >>> this: &

Re: Static Network of brokers

2007-11-26 Thread Koka
) is starting >> INFO BrokerService - For help or more information >> please >> see: http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/ >> INFO faultPersistenceAdapterFactory - Journal is locked... waiting 10 >> seconds for the journal to be unlocked. >> WARN Ma

Re: Static Network of brokers

2007-11-23 Thread Rob Davies
does every broker have a different broker name? On Nov 23, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Koka wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to set up a static network of brokers. my config xml looks like this: class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderCon figurer"/> h

Static Network of brokers

2007-11-23 Thread Koka
Hi All, I'm trying to set up a static network of brokers. my config xml looks like this: http://activemq.org/config/1.0";> When I start ActiveMQ, i get something like: WARN NetworkConnector - Could not start network bridg