t;will1" wrote:
> Thanks Tim.. If anyone has any relevant benchmarks they could provide, that
> would be really useful.. any more thoughts on the original question would
> be
> appreciated also..
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283
Thanks Tim.. If anyone has any relevant benchmarks they could provide, that
would be really useful.. any more thoughts on the original question would be
appreciated also..
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-MySQL-datastore-performance-tp4703223p4703233
ed LevelDB approach..?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-MySQL-datastore-performance-tp4703223p4703230.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Hi Tim.. thanks for the swift response..
Do you have any benchmarks for the KahaDB or replicated LevelDB approach..?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-MySQL-datastore-performance-tp4703223p4703230.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list
2. Would a different datastore strategy provide better performance
> in terms
> of persistence eg
> a. High performance journaled JDBC (MySQL) (would just
> need a solution to
> replicate the journal)
> b. File based datastore eg replicated
zookper.
Inputs would be greatly appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-MySQL-datastore-performance-tp4703223.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
