Try it out. And check the source. The source is your friend. We are an
open source community, and happy to be so.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:52 AM, xabhi wrote:
> Please respond
>
> -
> Abhi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4
Please respond
-
Abhi
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-tp4677915p4678345.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Can anybody answer the queries posted in previous post.
-
Abhi
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-tp4677915p4678236.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I have few more queries:
1. IIUC, If there is only one producer sending persistent messages, then
journal writes will happen for every message and Slow KahaDB access logging
will be done for every message.
2. In what cases does "Slow KahaDB access: Journal read took " will logged
es are
> persisted together?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Abhi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-tp4677915p4678030.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com
message) or a bunch of messages are
persisted together?
Thanks,
Abhi
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-tp4677915p4678030.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb.html
On Feb 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, xabhi wrote:
> Can somebody from activemq dev answer these queries please?
>
> Thanks,
> Abhi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB
Can somebody from activemq dev answer these queries please?
Thanks,
Abhi
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-tp4677915p4677981.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
Does journal append and read happens for every new persistent message that
is received by the broker? or it happens after some time interval, if yes
can it be configured?
Thanks,
Abhi
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-tp4677915.html
Sent
Thanks Dejan!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/INFO-Slow-KahaDB-access-tp4291812p4309680.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
://www.nighttale.net
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Zagan wrote:
> Hi,
> I am getting the following logged information in the activemq.log file.
>
> INFO | Slow KahaDB access
>
> What does it mean? Is this an error? How could I prevent this error?
>
> --
> View this
Hi,
I am getting the following logged information in the activemq.log file.
INFO | Slow KahaDB access
What does it mean? Is this an error? How could I prevent this error?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/INFO-Slow-KahaDB-access-tp4291812p4291812.html
Sent
I am also seeing these. I understand that you can set a thrreshold to stop it
logging, but it seems that things slow down or stall while KahaDB performs
an index. Ie- consumers of this broker are blocked waiting for the index to
complete.
This happens when my message store grows to several thousa
Dear Ben,
There has already been a discussion similar to yours:
http://old.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-td26594249.html#a26594249
<http://old.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-td26594249.html#a26594249>You can
have a look at the page dedicated to the KahaDb:
http://cwiki.apache.org/conf
When running the current ActiveMQ MessageBroker (under WinXP) the console
shows dozends of notifications like
"Slow KahaDB access: cleanup took 545"
Whats wrong?
How can I avoind these msgs?
Ben
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-%22Slow-KahaDB
all
> the messages are asynchronous.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-tp26594249p26629348.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com
this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-tp26594249p26629348.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The problem is that they cannot be interpreted by the end user and even if
they could here is no clear corresponding lever to tweak at this time. It
makes sense to leave them in but with a default threshold of 0, such that
they must be enabled, by a knowledgeable user, with a limit that makes sense
>Are you noticing delays in producers or consumers or just a little worried
>about the INFO message?
My main concern was about the message. I haven't seen any delays.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Slow-KahaDB-access-tp26594249p26617441.html
Sent from t
Gary Tully wrote:
> Those log messages are developer debug aids that were added early on in the
> dev cycle and possibly should now be removed.
If those messages can be interpreted by end user why not leave them in? Right
now I agree that they might be of little use, because we haven't got any
duration while it has the lock as it should be.
Are you noticing delays in producers or consumers or just a little worried
about the INFO message?
2009/12/1 neillott
>
> Hi,
>
> I know this question was posted earlier, but can anyone help here?
>
> http://old.nabble.com/
/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:56 PM, neillott wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I know this question was posted earlier, but can anyone help here?
>
> http://old.nabble.com/slow-KahaDB-access-td26172918.html#a26216649
&
Hi,
I know this question was posted earlier, but can anyone help here?
http://old.nabble.com/slow-KahaDB-access-td26172918.html#a26216649
I'm seeing this in my activemq log:
2009-12-01 09:29:08,690 | INFO | Slow KahaDB access: cleanup took
Matthew Hixson wrote:
> I see these messages: "Slow KahaDB access: cleanup took 1998"
I've also seen those messages. It is nice to get a hint about
possible performance issues. Now it be even better if someone could
offer a ballpark figure when to worry, and what to do abou
I see these messages scroll up the console:
INFO | Slow KahaDB access: cleanup took 1998
I found this
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2404
but was wondering if this indicates underpowered hardware for ActiveMQ
to be running on. This is one of our test servers with no load
25 matches
Mail list logo
