Re: SAN Hardware for Master/Slave Architecture

2007-08-13 Thread RobBugh
a Systems Analyst involved earlier on in this project. > Calling in a SAN specialist afterwards is even more expensive. And SAN > specialists hate SANs setup by people who didn't fully research or > understand the technology they deployed. > > > Tom > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SAN-Hardware-for-Master-Slave-Architecture-tf4251221s2354.html#a12128621 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SAN Hardware for Master/Slave Architecture

2007-08-10 Thread Tom Samplonius
- "RobBugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to install ActiveMQ in a shared file system Master/Slave > configuration. I see on the ActiveMQ web site that SAN is suggested as > the > shared file system. Unfortunately, I don't know much about SAN > technology > and what choices I have. Is

SAN Hardware for Master/Slave Architecture

2007-08-10 Thread RobBugh
g to share what hardware you are using and any pros and cons to using it, especially as it relates to file level locking? Regards, Rob -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SAN-Hardware-for-Master-Slave-Architecture-tf4251221s2354.html#a12099535 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User ma