k you very much.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Replicated-LevelDB-performance-problem-tp4679151p4679386.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
elDB.
I'm very confused now.I wonder whether it's my configuration problem or it's
really a bug.
And i wonder which master-slave solution is maturer and recommended for
activemq in a industrial practice.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/
to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Replicated-LevelDB-performance-problem-tp4679151.html
> To start a new topic under ActiveMQ - User, email
> ml-node+s2283324n234180...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe
elDB.
I'm very confused now.I wonder whether it's my configuration problem or it's
really a bug.
And i wonder which master-slave solution is maturer and recommended for
activemq in a industrial practice.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/