nly work with a single
consumer.
Let me know what you think.
Best regards,
Kristof
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Reliably-calculate-time-spent-in-broker-tp4669606p4669916.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
re about the architecture
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Reliably-calculate-time-spent-in-broker-tp4669606p4669891.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
queue ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Kristof
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Reliably-calculate-time-spent-in-broker-tp4669606p4669759.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
istof
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Reliably-calculate-time-spent-in-broker-tp4669606p4669759.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
closed / opened and so on.
>
>
> Before looking at other alternatives I was hoping somebody could tell me
> whether our assumptions are correct ? and if so what possible solutions
> exist to deal with this issue.
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Kristof
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Reliably-calculate-time-spent-in-broker-tp4669606.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
so what possible solutions
exist to deal with this issue.
Thanks
Kristof
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Reliably-calculate-time-spent-in-broker-tp4669606.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.