Re: systemUsage configuration

2008-07-18 Thread agrace
aliu wrote: > > Hi, just to clarify. In my last post, when I mentioned 'all the pending > messages are in memory', I actually mean uncommitted messages within a > transaction. Again, can someone confirm if this statement (all uncommitted > messages are kept in memory) is true? > I am also new

Re: systemUsage configuration

2008-07-16 Thread aliu
Hi, just to clarify. In my last post, when I mentioned 'all the pending messages are in memory', I actually mean uncommitted messages within a transaction. Again, can someone confirm if this statement (all uncommitted messages are kept in memory) is true? aliu wrote: > > The reason I've been t

Re: systemUsage configuration

2008-07-15 Thread aliu
The reason I've been trying to figure out these memory limit configurations is because we have the following use case: I want to be able to send a large amount of data (>2g) to the queue without any consumer consuming it for some time, but it seems like active mq actually keeps all the pending me

Re: systemUsage configuration

2008-07-15 Thread Aaron Mulder
Are you validating the XML just to make sure it's not a syntax error? I get stuff onto disk with a configuration like this (and a producer sending 1 MB messages): ... ... Thanks, Aaron On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at

Re: systemUsage configuration

2008-07-15 Thread aliu
Hi, Thanks for the quick reply. If I don't want to keep everything in memory, and I want to be able to set how much should be stored in memory and if there are more stuff coming, it'd be spilled out to disk, what configuration settings can I use? I actually tried setting the destination limits h

Re: systemUsage configuration

2008-07-14 Thread Aaron Mulder
I am by no means an authority on this, but I'm not sure the store usage or temp usage settings are actually used for anything. I believe you want your memory usage setting to be high enough to hold all the traffic you expect to be in memory at once. I think this is e.g. non-persistent messages th