Re: queue vs topic

2013-04-27 Thread webber
You mean stream message cannot share among consumers ? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/queue-vs-topic-tp4666180p4666306.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: queue vs topic

2013-04-26 Thread Christian Posta
If consumers "share" the stream of messages, ie, each gets a message from the stream, then use a queue. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:50 PM, webber wrote: > Thank you for reply. > > Please let me explain background of this question. > > I am designing enterprise integration architecture using activ

Re: queue vs topic

2013-04-25 Thread webber
Thank you for reply. Please let me explain background of this question. I am designing enterprise integration architecture using activemq to communicate multiple systems in a company. Initially, I designed to put queues among systems. But from the point of view of flexibility I came to think o

Re: queue vs topic

2013-04-24 Thread Christian Posta
of course it will depend on whether the destination will need to persist the message... but in terms of performance only, you'll probably find topics to be faster especially as you add consumers to queues. but the question you should be asking isn't which one is faster, but rather what sort of mes