Re: problems with master slave set up artemis 2.0

2017-05-12 Thread Justin Bertram
y 10, 2017 4:18:35 PM Subject: Re: problems with master slave set up artemis 2.0 Thank you Justin for the reply. For the third case, i did both kill -9 and normal stop, and the symptom is the same, basically the "idle" backup was not able to become an "active" backup. For the

Re: problems with master slave set up artemis 2.0

2017-05-10 Thread Lei
Thank you Justin for the reply. For the third case, i did both kill -9 and normal stop, and the symptom is the same, basically the "idle" backup was not able to become an "active" backup. For the first two cases, if it is expected behavior, how would we expect the replication delay or even data l

Re: problems with master slave set up artemis 2.0

2017-05-09 Thread Justin Bertram
> after all three start, only journal replication is only seen on one of the > slaves, i.e., the "active" slave. That's expected. > when the original master is restarted, the first "active" slave (the current > master) will stay as the live broker even with "allow-failback" set to true That's