Re: inactiveTimoutBeforeGC vs inactiveTimeoutBeforeGC

2014-09-19 Thread Kevin Burton
AH … fancy. You guys are on it!!! On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Tim Bain wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5253 > > Resolved in 5.11.0, not back-ported to any earlier version, so you'll just > need to wait. > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Kevin Burton wrote: > > > Ouch

Re: inactiveTimoutBeforeGC vs inactiveTimeoutBeforeGC

2014-09-19 Thread Tim Bain
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5253 Resolved in 5.11.0, not back-ported to any earlier version, so you'll just need to wait. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Kevin Burton wrote: > Ouch.. this is middy annoying. This should be considered a typo right? > not an abbreviation? > > IE t