1) Can you give more details & elaborate on the brokerfilter, configuration
of policy entries?
2) Were any filters set such that the messages will get dropped only when
they don't cater to some condition? An example is --> if message is of type
Price, drop. If message is of type Trade, don't drop
Hi Filip
I am using topics & no queues.
Is there a way to drop messages for particular consumers / for particular
temporary topics based on certain conditions?
For example, if the message type is of type A or B, don't discard. If
message is of type C, discard.
Can BrokerFilter be used for disc
that's wasn't possible in our case, since the app was 3rd party, with no
source code, we needed to override the "persistent" on the server
Filip
Rob Davies wrote:
You can always ensure the messages sent on the temporary topics are
non-persistent - (by setting the delivery mode on the producer)
You can always ensure the messages sent on the temporary topics are
non-persistent - (by setting the delivery mode on the producer) - and
then set the DLQ strategy property processNonPersistent=false
cheers,
Rob
http://open.iona.com/products/enterprise-activemq
http://rajdavies.blogspot.co
that's absolutely doable, what you'd need to do is set
producerFlowControl="false" on your policy entries,
that's what we did.
then we setup the pendingMessageLimitStrategy to 1000, and our problem
was that when a message was discarded it went to the DLQ and eventually
caused OOME.
The Broke
Thanks Filip for taking time & replying.
My use case is I have 5 components in my application which are consumers to
active mq & receive data through temporary topics. If 1 of the consumer
becomes slow, it blocks the publisher. I was thinking of configuring in
activemq.xml based on topic / destin
Sure Badri,
our use case that we were dropping messages on the broker, so they go to
the Dead Letter Queue (DLQ),
however, for temporary topics, we didn't want that to happen, and since
I wasn't able to configure a policy for temp topics where we could plug
in a discarding DLQ, then we just did
Hi Filip
Can you give more details about the broker plugin filter?
I also need to create policy entry for temporary topics.
Thanks for your help & time.
Badri
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>
> I couldn't get that to work properly, I even tried topic="ID>" since
> that was the prefix, and di
I couldn't get that to work properly, I even tried topic="ID>" since
that was the prefix, and didn't work either.
I worked around the problem by creating a broker plugin filter, and
doing my operations in there
Filip
Hiram Chirino wrote:
I guess you want an entry for all topics or all queues
I guess you want an entry for all topics or all queues right (since
the actually names are dynamic)?
One way to do it might be to use topic='>' since that would match all
topics (temp topics are still topics). But I guess we should have
something a little bette than that.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at
10 matches
Mail list logo
