Hi:
Thank you very much! I have solved the problem. The reason is that I didn't
convert the object to primitive type. Now I have converted the object to
byte[].It's OK.
2007/11/13, jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> *I have read your letter, but I have create a MessageProducer, please look
> at th
*I have read your letter, but I have create a MessageProducer, please look
at the code below, and I have use Spring2.0*
**
**
public class OrderMessageProducer {
*private JmsTemplate template;*
private Queue destination;
public void setTemplate(JmsTemplate template) {
this.template = templ
failover is just used by the brokerURL property of the connection
factory. Btw session and producers are cheap objects to keep around
they are just a bit slow to create on demand. For sending the
PooledConnectionFactory should help
On 12/11/2007, TOPPER_HARLEY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >"Its
>"Its normally a glitch in the network - or that the broker died." :
I'm pretty sure the broker was OK since a new client could get a connection
& session and create a temp queue. I previously registered another query (
http://www.nabble.com/Temp-queue-deleted-when-thread-interrupted-tf4393533s23
On 12/11/2007, TOPPER_HARLEY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"It could just be the socket has been dropped.":
> Is socket dropping a common occurence or simply related to the quality of
> the network one is running on (my TCP level knowledge isn't great).
Its normally a glitch in the network - or th
>"It could just be the socket has been dropped.":
Is socket dropping a common occurence or simply related to the quality of
the network one is running on (my TCP level knowledge isn't great). Would
vm: style for the brokerURL prevent this since it would be insice JVM?
This is our setup:
We have a
Without more information on how you are using the JMS client its hard
to know really. It could just be the socket has been dropped.
You night wanna enable failover...
http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-auto-reconnection.html
On 10/11/2007, TOPPER_HARLEY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
