Hi,
Has anyone experienced the same sluggishness sending transacted persistent
messages with AMQ 5.2 and the default ActiveMQ Persistence store?
Is there any reason that it is much slower than the Kaha store?
Thanks
hackingbear wrote:
>
> Test case written, bug filed.
>
> https://issues.a
OK, I nailed down the problem (and update the bug.) The default AMQ
Persistence store shipped with 5.2 is very slow. Clean out the data
directory wouldn't help. Switching over to Kaha works.
now, before the problem is fixed. I want to know what are the plus and minus
of using kaha store, comparin
Test case written, bug filed.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2136
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p22141040.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Not an answer, only an anecdote:
We upgraded from 5.1 to 5.2 a couple weeks ago, and I benchmarked our
message throughput.
requester thread
create request queue
create reply queue
listen to reply queue
loop
send short message with unique JMSCorrelationid
put correlation Id on a C
Seems odd, Are you using a transacted session?
Could you post your code so we can give it a whirl? possibly attach it
to a jira issue.
2009/2/17 hackingbear :
>
> Hi, any help on this? 5.2 shouldn't be a few times slower, but I can't find
> out why. All the other configs are out-of-box defaults.
Hi, any help on this? 5.2 shouldn't be a few times slower, but I can't find
out why. All the other configs are out-of-box defaults.
hackingbear wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded to 5.2.0 last week and witness my application performance
> dropped substantially. I wrote a simple test which does:
>
