Thanks for the info. I have decided to go with a separae broker. It'll be
easier than a more complex setup.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Separate-persistence-provider-per-queue-tp4711444p4711713.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
Actually, if you read the rest of the posts, I'm trying to do the exact
opposite. Not store and forward but just persist locally on the machine
separate from the other store and forward queues that forward to another
host. Store and forward to the same machine makes no sense to me.
--
View thi
Using the local broker as a facade for the remote broker will work, as long
as it's OK for the messages from the remote broker to be stored on the
local broker. (OK both from the standpoints of "allowable" and from the
standpoint of having enough disk space, performance, etc.) If that isn't
OK, t
Allan-
Have you looked into a store-and-forward architecture? This would allow
you to store to the local broker, then the broker would forward to the
remote broker. Same queue names, the brokers just handle everything for you.
-Matt Pavlovich
On 5/2/16 12:08 PM, Allan Wax wrote:
Is it possi
Thanks for the info. The reason for doing it this way is that the
information must stay local to the machine and has nothing to do with the
other queues. The persistence is needed in case the local processing that
goes elsewhere on the machine fails and we need to recover later. I'm
trying hard
I agree, from my very quick search it doesn't look like there's a way to do
what you want.
Would you really want to, even if you could? I assume the network share is
to allow this broker to be part of a master-slave grouping. If one queue
is persisted to a location the others can't access, then
To be clear, this is with ActiveMQ 5.x.
The setup is that there is a single broker on a particular host whose
purpose is to forward on messages from several queues to another host which
is shared by multiple other hosts. The dataDirectory for the broker is a
network location which is shared by mu
What does it mean (to you) for a queue's persistence to be local or to be
on a remote broker? Those phrases don't mean anything to me, so unless
they mean something to someone else, your question's unlikely to get
answered as it's currently written. Please clarify what you mean, and
someone may b
