I believe throwing an exception is the right thing to do.
Joe
Free ActiveMQ User Reference Guide @ http://www.ttmsolutions.com
mcarter wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> Re #2 - you could write yourself a broker plugin thingy that extends
>> BrokerService and implements the addConnection(ConnectionContext
>
> Re #2 - you could write yourself a broker plugin thingy that extends
> BrokerService and implements the addConnection(ConnectionContext context,
> ConnectionInfo info) method; within which you can check the IP address of
> the remote client making the connection request.
>
>
I've imple
We have still been unable to get activemq to honor the configuration file
broker name and uselocalhost options.
AMQ still tries to resolve the ip provided in the transport connector to a
dns name . It does this even when provided with a broker name and setting
the transport connector use localhos
OK
I have been unable to get ActiveMQ to work in a system with two connected
networks
in the this set up
system A has two NICs
NIC 0 connected to the public network
NIC 1 connected to a private network
I have configured AMQ to only listen on the private network for messages. I
have posted th
I have scrapped the uri addition .
I tried changing the broker name property and the useLocalHostBrokerName to
false.
However the problem is unchanged AMQ still gets the machine DNS name from
the public interface and then complains that it is unable to resolve the
public DNS name on the privat
I also tried adding
" ?useLocalHost=true " to the Transport connector
as follows
which also fails, AMQ still gets the machine domain name from the public
interface and then tries to resolve that name on the private network
interface.
Is this bug or is there something i am missing .? It se
Ok i set the broker name..and commented out the network connect line.
However I still get "unknown host exception" .. the host name in the error
is the domain name of the server but AMQ must be getting that information
over the other "public" interface ..which i have not used in the config .
Is
Ok
so this line
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
brokerName="localhost" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data">
Allows me to change the broker name ..which will be used to create the UID ?
Joe Fernandez wrote:
>
> The broker is trying to create a "unique id" for itself. Someth
The broker is trying to create a "unique id" for itself. Something along
these lines
ID:PEDRO-3500-123265619-8203-0:0
Where "PEDRO" is the host name.
You can assign the broker a name via the cfg file, but it still needs the
UID.
Theline
is telling the broker to establish a forwarding br
Thanks for the reply
I saw that too. That poses a problem . The private network I have set up for
JMS has no DNS service , intentionally . Why does active MQ need an name?
Can't it just default to the IP ? Can i set this name in the config file ?
re#1
so this line ins correct under transport c
Looks like the broker is trying to generate an id for itself, but can't
because this statement is hurling an unknownhost exception
hostName = InetAddress.getLocalHost().getHostName();
So I reckon the IP address of the local host cannot be resolved. Check your
network settings.
Re #1 - the way
11 matches
Mail list logo
