Re: STOMP - transacted session

2009-02-19 Thread freetwix
hey dejan, after thinking about the stomp ack described on the wiki page i have some points to mention. As far is i understand the behaviour of jms transacted sessions, the big advantage is the use of the message broker for delayed delivery. for me this was understood as a message broker support

Re: STOMP - transacted session

2009-02-17 Thread freetwix
hey dejan, thats good news, thankx for the fixes. greets, jochen -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/STOMP---transacted-session-tp22011259p22066145.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: STOMP - transacted session

2009-02-17 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi Jochen, try using transactions using 5.3-SNAPSHOT, it should work. Take a look at this article for example http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/How+do+I+unack+the+message+with+Stomp Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - h