hey dejan,
after thinking about the stomp ack described on the wiki page i have some
points to mention. As far is i understand the behaviour of jms transacted
sessions, the big advantage is the use of the message broker for delayed
delivery.
for me this was understood as a message broker support
hey dejan,
thats good news, thankx for the fixes.
greets,
jochen
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/STOMP---transacted-session-tp22011259p22066145.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Jochen,
try using transactions using 5.3-SNAPSHOT, it should work.
Take a look at this article for example
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/How+do+I+unack+the+message+with+Stomp
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - h