Re: SMB 3.0 as shared filesystem for kahaDB in Master/Slave

2019-06-27 Thread blue_nekton
Hi Cezkuj, Were you able to achieve? I am exploring ActiveMq Artemis Master and Slave configuration on Azure Files (SMB3.0) and would like to know whether you were be able to complete. Thanks -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: SMB 3.0 as shared filesystem for kahaDB in Master/Slave

2018-09-11 Thread cezkuj
Hi! Sad to be the only one :(. I will try if approach suggested by you satisfies my needs (I don't want to overcomplicate whole setup) Thanks for response. I will bump it when I found easiest way to solve my problem :) Kind regards, Cezary -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com

Re: SMB 3.0 as shared filesystem for kahaDB in Master/Slave

2018-09-07 Thread Tim Bain
You're the only person I've heard of trying to use a SMB share as the filesystem for a KahaDB master-slave configuration during the four years I've been watching this list, so it's quite possible that the file-locking semantics of SMB don't allow ActiveMQ to use SMB for locking (to determine which