On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:34 AM, mffrench wrote:
>
> Thanks for your answer. Would like to know if there is a sense to raise a
> JIRA for this ? It could be a good way to simplify the configuration ...
Sure, for any improvements you'd like to see, please create a JIRA
issue to provide your expla
Thanks for your answer. Would like to know if there is a sense to raise a
JIRA for this ? It could be a good way to simplify the configuration ...
++
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM, mffrench wrote:
>>
>> About the networkTTL is there a way to set it to infinite value ???
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM, mffrench wrote:
>
> About the networkTTL is there a way to set it to infinite value ???
There's no special value for that. The solution is to note the most
amount of hops that a message might need to make across brokers to
reach a subscription. Note that messages
About the networkTTL is there a way to set it to infinite value ???
Thanks ...
++
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, mffrench wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to know if it's possible to configure ActiveMQ to route
>> messages from a broker A to a broker C through a bro
One possible option is to leverage/extend the existing LDAP discovery
mechanism to make things a bit more dynamic wrt network connectors.
http://activemq.apache.org/ldap-broker-discovery-mechanism.html
You could use the Apache DS, which btw rocks!
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
bsnyder wr
If I configure any network connector thanks AMQ API or JMX will this
configuration be persistent ?
++
mffrench wrote:
>
> Is there any way to configure network connector through JMX ?
>
>
> bsnyder wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:14 AM, mffrench wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you for your ans
Is there any way to configure network connector through JMX ?
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:14 AM, mffrench wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for your answer. I'll try to make my topology thanks your
>> advise.
>> Anyway I've another question. Is there a dynamic way to configure network
>>
You were right to underline this point I do not know :)
In fact I do not understand why the routing is done on the GET and not
directly on the PUT. I do not see the interest to keep the message in the
non final destination broker. For me this is a problem because that's mean
if you have N nodes t
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:14 AM, mffrench wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer. I'll try to make my topology thanks your advise.
> Anyway I've another question. Is there a dynamic way to configure network
> connector ? The only configuration way I found was editing xml configuration
> files (so a
Thank you for your answer. I'll try to make my topology thanks your advise.
Anyway I've another question. Is there a dynamic way to configure network
connector ? The only configuration way I found was editing xml configuration
files (so a static configuration since you need to reboot activemq). Do
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, mffrench wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if it's possible to configure ActiveMQ to route
> messages from a broker A to a broker C through a broker B. In fact I aim to
> achieve this kind of topology :
>
> client X (network 1) send Message to Broker C via
11 matches
Mail list logo
