Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-28 Thread James Strachan
On 3/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: "Christopher G. Stach II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ``tcp'' can refer to _any_ broker, local or remote, that has a TCP > transportConnector. I understand; it is also my understanding that TCP transport connector may be used

Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-27 Thread uma_rk
From: "Christopher G. Stach II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ``tcp'' can refer to _any_ broker, local or remote, that has a TCP > transportConnector. I understand; it is also my understanding that TCP transport connector may be used only if the broker running as a distinct process - either

Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-27 Thread Christopher G. Stach II
Adrian Co wrote: > Yeah. tcp would refer to an external broker. Can you post the complete > stack trace? > > BTW, can you try using broker.useJmx=false instead of just useJmx=false? > > Is the exception occu > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Suchitha, >> >> Thanks for your help. I thought a URL of

Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-27 Thread Adrian Co
TED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:31 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Problems with VM transport To follow up on my last mail: I can perhaps avoid the problem by using distinct brokernames for each webapp; but that would create distinct embedded brokers perhaps? I need both the

RE: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-27 Thread uma_rk
here by the broker is a part of > servlets web app. > > > > > Hope this helps. > Thanks, > Suchitha. > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:31 PM > To: users@activ

RE: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-27 Thread Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru)
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:31 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Problems with VM transport To follow up on my last mail: I can perhaps avoid the problem by using distinct brokernames for each webapp; but that would create distinct embedded brokers perhaps? I need both t

Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-26 Thread uma_rk
To follow up on my last mail: I can perhaps avoid the problem by using distinct brokernames for each webapp; but that would create distinct embedded brokers perhaps? I need both the webapps to share the same broker so they receive messages published by each other. Regards, /U -- O

Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-26 Thread uma_rk
Hi - I am using the embedded broker in a servlet container. Each webapp in the servlet container instantiates a connection factory that refers to broker URL of vm://localhost?broker.persistent=false as follows: (Servlet Container (WebApp1

Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-26 Thread Adrian Co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adrian, Thanks for the note. > >Startup: vm://localhost > >During runtime (after an event): > >failover(vm://localhost,tcp://remote:61616) > > > > Would modifying the broker URL of the connection factory cause p

Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-26 Thread uma_rk
Adrian, Thanks for the note. > >Startup: vm://localhost > >During runtime (after an event): > >failover(vm://localhost,tcp://remote:61616) > > > > Would modifying the broker URL of the connection factory cause problems? > >

Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-26 Thread Adrian Co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello... I have a couple of basic questions on ActiveMQ. I would appreciate any hits as I am stuck. I am using ActiveMQ 4.1 with JDK6. 1) When I use an embedded broker with vm transport (vm://localhost) the instantiation of my Spring SimpleMessageListenerContainer alw

RE: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-25 Thread Manish Gulati
. -Original Message- From: Manish Gulati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:08 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: RE: Problems with VM transport Hi, For JournalLockedException, include activeio-core-3.0-beta4.jar (you may have different version of this) in your

RE: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-25 Thread Manish Gulati
copies without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. -Original Message- From: Christopher G. Stach II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:42 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Problems with VM transport [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello... > >

Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-25 Thread Christopher G. Stach II
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello... > > I have a couple of basic questions on ActiveMQ. I would appreciate any hits > as I am stuck. > > I am using ActiveMQ 4.1 with JDK6. > > 1) When I use an embedded broker with vm transport (vm://localhost) > the instantiation of my Spring SimpleMessageListe

Re: Problems with VM transport

2007-03-25 Thread Steven Marcus
I can only speak to #3. There is a spelling error the URL should read: vm://localhost?broker.persistent=false I am using a Spring SimpleMessageListenerContainer on jdk1.6 on linux with 4.1.1RC1 without the issue you describe. I am fairly sure it worked with 4.1 too, with a non-persistent broker