Re: Problem with embedded broker

2014-11-13 Thread juanmanuel.romeraferrio
Perfect! This works that I expected. Thanks. Juan Manuel -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-embedded-broker-tp4687370p4687404.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Problem with embedded broker

2014-11-13 Thread Tim Bain
You can specify that messages should be forwarded even if no consumer is connected by using the staticallyIncludedDestinations element on the networkConnector. See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Fuse_ESB_Enterprise/7.1/html/Using_Networks_of_Brokers/files/FMQNetworksMessagePropagati

Re: Problem with embedded broker

2014-11-13 Thread juanmanuel.romeraferrio
This is by default? Can I change that? What's the best architecture for a system that need send message to a remote broker all the time and if the remote broker is offline, need to save this message in a local queue and send when the connection is established again ? -- View this message in cont

Re: Problem with embedded broker

2014-11-12 Thread Tim Bain
That's expected behavior. By default, brokers only forward messages when there's a currently-connected consumer somewhere in the network. If there's no consumer, the message will hang out on the producing broker, waiting for the consumer to connect. When it does connect, the broker that holds th