That would get the messages into their respective queues. I still need a
solution for the STOMP consumers to subscribe to multiple queues and process
messages from them in priority order. I think the select() based approach
I mentioned previously will work. I wanted to see if there were other
o
Oops, sorry. When I saw this statement, I thought you wanted a message routed
to a particular queue based on its priority.
"Put the messages with different priorities into different queues"
If that is the case, then I think you can have the broker - using composite
destinations and selectors - a
Thanks, Joe.
I'm not sure content-based routing would do what I'm looking for (maybe you
can explain further).
I'd like the same group of consumers to process messages with different
priorities but to give preference in the order of processing to higher
priority messages.
On Feb 12, 2008 11:01 AM
I would say the answer to your first question is 'yes'.
Sounds like you're implementing a content-based routing pattern.
If you can't use Camel to implement the pattern, then consider configuring
the broker with composite destinations in combination with a selector to let
the broker do the rou
Thanks for the link, Joe.
So it looks like consumer priority is used by the broker to determine which
subscriber to choose as the exclusive consumer?
Does AMQ support message priorities? This ticket would suggest the answer
is no (http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-122)
Does anyone hav
Hi Roger,
I'd disregard the consumer priority feature; it does not function as
described in the consumer priority page.
Here's the exclusive consumer web page.
http://activemq.apache.org/exclusive-consumer.html
Joe
www.ttmsolutions.com
Roger Hoover wrote:
>
> I want to implement a
