Re: Persistence delay in JDBC Master/Slave approach

2010-10-29 Thread Gary Tully
If you can live with possible message loss, which seems to be the case if the client does not want to wait then use the ActiveMQ connection factory property useAsyncSend. For persistence messages this defaults to false, such that the client waits till the message is stored, but when true, even pers

Re: Persistence delay in JDBC Master/Slave approach

2010-10-28 Thread Johan Edstrom
The pages outlining HA are pretty clear on the concept. If you want a hybrid approach of persisting things yourself, sure, divert the messages, use camel. Anything in RAM is gone if you lost that node, anything in "transit" is lost. On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:18 PM, kseelam wrote: > > Hi All > >