Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-30 Thread Jim Gomes
The NMS.MSMQ provider is supported, and does compile with the latest NMS 1.7.0. It's just that a new binary hasn't been put out in a while. On Apr 30, 2015 10:05 PM, "rjrizzuto" wrote: > Thanks for the update. I am new to Apache.NMS and message oriented > middleware in general. We currently are

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-30 Thread rjrizzuto
Thanks for the update. I am new to Apache.NMS and message oriented middleware in general. We currently are using MSMQs in a product, and finding it limiting. I'm looking at alternatives, and initally plan on using Apache.NMS with Apollo. If Apache.NMS.MSMQ was supported, I was going to use that

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-29 Thread Jim Gomes
The ZeroMQ provider isn't quite ready to be declared stable. There are still more things I want to do with it. It basically works, but due to the inherent asynchronous nature of ZeroMQ, it is difficult to create a deterministic workflow of knowing exactly when a sender and receiver are fully initia

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-29 Thread Timothy Bish
On 04/29/2015 01:50 PM, rjrizzuto wrote: > I thought I saw that there is a new ZeroMQ provider in 1.7.0. Does the same > issue of not having an owner apply to it as well? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695916.

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-29 Thread rjrizzuto
I thought I saw that there is a new ZeroMQ provider in 1.7.0. Does the same issue of not having an owner apply to it as well? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695916.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archiv

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-29 Thread Timothy Bish
On 04/29/2015 01:26 PM, rjrizzuto wrote: > If I understand the build process, it seems like it would have been easy to > build ALL the binaries, with the possible exception of EMS, when Apache.NMS > and Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ were built. Or does the source code for the other > providers no longer bui

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-29 Thread rjrizzuto
If I understand the build process, it seems like it would have been easy to build ALL the binaries, with the possible exception of EMS, when Apache.NMS and Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ were built. Or does the source code for the other providers no longer build? -- View this message in context: http:/

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-29 Thread Timothy Bish
On 04/29/2015 12:46 PM, rjrizzuto wrote: > The 1.7.0 binaries for Apache.NMS and Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ are now in NuGet, > courtesy of the Chris Robison et al. > > Is there any chance that some of the other provider binaries could be made > available here so they could be placed into NuGet? > > > > -

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-29 Thread rjrizzuto
The 1.7.0 binaries for Apache.NMS and Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ are now in NuGet, courtesy of the Chris Robison et al. Is there any chance that some of the other provider binaries could be made available here so they could be placed into NuGet? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.228332

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-29 Thread Timothy Bish
On 04/29/2015 11:04 AM, rjrizzuto wrote: > Is there any documentation of feature differences between the 1.7 and 1.6 > branch? Are both stable? I am trying to determine what version to use in > an application I am writing that will be using ActiveMQ Apollo as the > broker. > > > > -- > View this

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-29 Thread rjrizzuto
Is there any documentation of feature differences between the 1.7 and 1.6 branch? Are both stable? I am trying to determine what version to use in an application I am writing that will be using ActiveMQ Apollo as the broker. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.c

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-28 Thread Timothy Bish
On 04/28/2015 01:50 PM, rjrizzuto wrote: > I will contact the NuGet owners. Thanks for the suggestion. > > It would be nice if the News section of http://activemq.apache.org/nms/ was > updated with current information since it currently makes it look like > nothing has happened since 2013. > > >

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-28 Thread rjrizzuto
I will contact the NuGet owners. Thanks for the suggestion. It would be nice if the News section of http://activemq.apache.org/nms/ was updated with current information since it currently makes it look like nothing has happened since 2013. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.228

Re: NMS versioning and NuGet

2015-04-27 Thread Timothy Bish
On 04/27/2015 12:13 PM, rjrizzuto wrote: > http://activemq.apache.org/nms/ lists the latest Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ as > 1.6.1, the version I just downloaded using NuGet is 1.6.3.3483, and there is > 1.6.5 in https://archive.apache.org/dist/activemq/apache-nms/1.6.0/ and a > 1.7.0 in https://archive.ap