We've had to wait until today to have another incident. To answer your
questions:
- the two (expected) connections (one per tenant) are active.
- the number of consumers for the destination is correct: again two.
- A non-durable subscription exists for each client. Again two in total.
Basically, w
Thanks Raul, I'll check that next time it happens. Trying 5.6.0 is in
the pipeline. Will report back as soons as I know more. Could easily be
a couple of weeks until it happens again.
Jeremias Maerki
On 04.06.2012 15:48:28 Raul Kripalani wrote:
> Definitely upgrade to 5.5.1 or later.
>
> What
Definitely upgrade to 5.5.1 or later.
What does your JMX instrumentation tell you when the problem occurs?
- Is the connection active?
- Does the # of consumers in the destination match what you expect?
- Does a subscription for that client exist?
My questions boil down to: at that poin
Hhm, SMX 4.4.1 deploys ActiveMQ 5.5.1 just nicely into its OSGi container.
On May 30, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hi Torsten,
>
> thanks. Yes, I've made experiments with 5.5.1 on the server side but had
> trouble getting it up reliably in my OSGi environment so I'm hesitant to
>
Hi Torsten,
thanks. Yes, I've made experiments with 5.5.1 on the server side but had
trouble getting it up reliably in my OSGi environment so I'm hesitant to
upgrade on the server side. However, the problem resides mainly in the
client AFAICS, and that one uses 5.5.1 already. I guess I'll take a p
Hello,
ActiveMQ 5.3.0 is really old. Have you thought of upgrading to the latest
broker release 5.5.1?
Chances aren't too bad that your problem has been resolved.
Torsten Mielke
tors...@fusesource.com
tmie...@blogspot.com
On May 30, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> No ideas? As
No ideas? As a work-around I'm now thinking about running a scheduled
task that restarts the MessageListener every hour. That's a work-around
that shouldn't really be necessary, right? A colleague told me yesterday
that he did exactly that in a personal project of his. So, I'm probably
not the only
