On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:35:31AM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
> > It's a good point, however this isn't the case we are worrying about for
> > now,
> > we are just trying to prove the concept. If the consumer did not send the
> > acknowledgement, will the broker not route another messages to tha
2008/8/26 Eugene Dzhurinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 09:17:09AM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
>> How many commands and sets of messages are required? Only normally
>> with the the worker pattern you send all the required commands to be
>> executed by a consumer in a single mess
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 09:17:09AM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
> How many commands and sets of messages are required? Only normally
> with the the worker pattern you send all the required commands to be
> executed by a consumer in a single message.
In fact the consumer may issue various commands
2008/8/25 Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello!
>
> Can somebody please take a look at my question below and let me know is it
> possible to achieve such behavior with ActiveMQ?
>
> I need to distribute the system which is doing heavy calculation for clients.
> This means the client sen
