FYI - I downloaded AIO4J and give it a whirl against ActiveMQ 5. Unless I'm
missing something, AIO4J is not supported in ActiveMQ 5. The 'activeio' and
'aio' transport schemes (e.g., activeio:aio://localhost:61616 or
aio://localhost:61616) are not supported and there is no reference in the
activ
Thanks, Bruce.
Joe
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:55 AM, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Re the reference to "AIO", does this mean support for AIO4J or that
>> AMQ's use
>> of NIO is considered asynchronous i/o?
>
> It's a reference to AIO4J:
>
> http://www.alphawo
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:55 AM, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Re the reference to "AIO", does this mean support for AIO4J or that AMQ's use
> of NIO is considered asynchronous i/o?
It's a reference to AIO4J:
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/aio4j
See the following for more informati
Re the reference to "AIO", does this mean support for AIO4J or that AMQ's use
of NIO is considered asynchronous i/o?
Joe
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:05 AM, davewolfs wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am hoping that some of you could provide me with some realistic
>>
You bring up some good points with respect to file descriptors. Any ideas
what the maximums are on an OS like linux? I was actually considering
modifying the REST Servlet so that it can support durable subscribers and if
this was the case then there is potential for a single JVM process to have
On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:05 AM, davewolfs wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am hoping that some of you could provide me with some realistic
numbers on
the maximum number of Durable Topic subscribers.
I have never worked with Active MQ so I am not familiar with it's
limits.
In a production environm
