Glad to hear it, and I wish I'd caught that sooner.
Tim
On Dec 7, 2015 9:20 AM, "gbrown" wrote:
> Thank you this has resolved my problem.
>
> Appreciate you looking into this.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Master-Slave-and-store-and-f
Thank you this has resolved my problem.
Appreciate you looking into this.
Gary
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Master-Slave-and-store-and-forward-topic-tp4704070p4704663.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Your networkConnectors need to have maxReconnectAttempts=0 if you're using
failover. This allows the bridge to be rebuilt (which reinitializes the
subscriptions properly) when a reconnect occurs; with a non-zero setting,
the failover transport eats the fact of the reconnect and the bridge ends
up
This is my nc entry, same entry on server1 and server2
I am using kahadb with a shared file system, nfs4.
Gary
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Master-Slave-and-store-and-forward-topic-tp4704070p4704240.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list a
Can you clarify the network configuration? It would help to see the network
connector settings for every individual broker. Something like the
following format would be great:
Server1
- static:failover:(...)
- static:failover:(...)
Server2
- static:failover:(...)
- static:failover:(...)
...
A
Yes the dequeue and enqueue counts on the S1 server change as expected.
I have not found any clues in the activemq.log, these are my current
settings in the log4j.properties
log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq.spring=DEBUG
log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq.web.handler=WARN
log4j.logger.org.springfram
OK, that's good info, and thank you for the version number. Am I right to
assume that if there were any errors or other unexpected output in the logs
on any of your brokers, you'd have mentioned them by now?
What about enqueue and dequeue counts for subscriptions on S1? Do you see
all enqueues t
Also in this test we are only testing with one subscriber. we would have more
once we get it working properly.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Master-Slave-and-store-and-forward-topic-tp4704070p4704100.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archiv
Looking in HAWTIO on the C2 server the subscriber is called
Durable(client1_subscriber1) the Enqueue counter only increased by 1 after
failover which could be consumed. After this no more messages make to this
subscriber and the counter does not increase. Hope that is the right
counter.
As I reali
My question about enqueues and dequeues was about those counts on each
*subscription*, and it wasn't clear from your answer whether that's what
you're describing or whether you're describing counts on the topic.
On Nov 19, 2015 7:13 AM, "gbrown" wrote:
> Subscription is durable.
>
> When the subs
Subscription is durable.
When the subscription is stopped and before we failover the messages make it
to C1 and are consumed when the subscription is started. So M1 with sub
started is consumed and M2, M3, M+ with sub down and then restarted are
consumed before failover.
With Failover M4 is rece
Your networkConnector URIs look fine.
Have you run the exact same test without a failover? How is the behavior
different?
Are your topic subscriptions durable?
So you send messages M1 with the subscriber connected and it's received
(which is expected), M2 with the subscriber disconnected but be
I am using
static:failover:(tcp://client1:61616,tcp://client2:61616)?randomize=false&maxReconnectAttempts=-1
A run through of the test I performed is
Started all servers, Server1 S1, Server2 S2, Client1 C1 and Cleint2 C2.
S1 and C1 are Master and S2 and C2 are slaves
connections checked and S1 is
Do you see a subscription from the new master of the second pair on the
master of the first pair?
Also, how are your networkConnectors configured? Did you remember to use
either masterslave: or static:failover: transports?
Tim
On Nov 18, 2015 1:52 PM, "gbrown" wrote:
> Hi
>
> When I setup 2 se
14 matches
Mail list logo