some clarity would be good
On 28 July 2015 at 01:16, William Greene wrote:
> I wish someone could update the Apollo home page to reflect that the
> project is no longer being developed..., to a new user, it appears that
> Apollo was supposed to be the next generation of activemq...
>
> I mean,
I wish someone could update the Apollo home page to reflect that the
project is no longer being developed..., to a new user, it appears that
Apollo was supposed to be the next generation of activemq...
I mean, why did it just die like that A blog post would be helpful on
the Apollo page.
On J
first: I don't know how you did that, but it seems you cross-posted
with all the activemq lists (including commit, commit-subscribe, ... I
had about of 20 entries to remove before I sent this response.
second: Why don't you take a look on ActiveMQ-Artemis. A lot of
Apollo's philosophy has been al
Hi
No. Apollo is a "dead" project. There is no active development on it.
I suggest to take a look at Apache ActiveMQ or Apache Artemis. They
both have cluster support.
http://activemq.apache.org/
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/
The latter has a better scalable architecture like Apollo (Artem
I already answered this a few emails earlier:
To my current knowledge, Apollo does not support clustering and I
believe there are no plans to implement this in the near future.
Also mentioned by me before, Apollo appears to be "abandoned" due to the
extremely low activity in the source code. S
Simple answer: no, Apache Apollo does not support a cluster deployment.
Also, by looking at the source code commits, it appears that the project
has been abandoned since there has been no commit to the sources since
January.
If you are really interested in Apollo, you may want to reach out to
