Re: Ignoring sub command log messages

2017-01-11 Thread Christopher Shannon
It's hard to say an exact time frame. Finished new features would be the driving force behind a 5.15.0 release as bug fixes are already backported but right now there hasn't been much done to justify a 5.15.0 release. Most work has been focused on Artemis but I would say that mid year sounds abou

Re: Ignoring sub command log messages

2017-01-11 Thread xabhi
Thanks christopher for the explanation. This makes sense. What are the timelines for ActiveMQ v5.15.0 release - mid year? I am asking because I plan to upgrade to 5.14.3 and if this issue will be handled well in 5.15.0 i would love to upgrade directly to 5.15.0. Thanks, Abhi -- View this mess

Re: Ignoring sub command log messages

2017-01-11 Thread Christopher Shannon
Yes if you have a ton of data on a durable subscription and delete the durable it tends to write a large temp file because of the kahadb index. Even though the temp file should be deleted automatically after deletion this is certainly not ideal. Right now there isn't really a good way to discard

Re: Ignoring sub command log messages

2017-01-11 Thread xabhi
Hi, Yes these log messages appeared at the startup only. I had faced an issue where activemq dumped 7gb file - tx-14693130-1483907222896.tmp in one of the mkahadb directories when i tried to destroy a durable topic consumer which was inactive for quite some time and had hit the memory threshold o

Re: Ignoring sub command log messages

2017-01-10 Thread Christopher Shannon
Did this happen while replaying the journal? This message means that an acknowledgement was processed in the journal that doesn't have a matching message. This log message would typically print out if you were replaying the journal from the beginning to rebuild the index because it's possible tha