Re: Failover all clients to same secondary broker

2014-04-28 Thread Noel OConnor
You could try something like DNS failover or a software loadbalancer presenting a VIP, but the easiest way might be to change you app to handle connecting to multiple brokers On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:57 AM, mchinea wrote: > So it seems the only way to be sure clients are connected to either b

Re: Failover all clients to same secondary broker

2014-04-28 Thread mchinea
So it seems the only way to be sure clients are connected to either broker reliably is to have one and only one of the brokers running and if/when it fails, start running the broker in the second server so the clients can switch to it. Is this correct? -- View this message in context: http://ac

Re: Failover all clients to same secondary broker

2014-04-09 Thread artnaseef
That will not be a reliable solution. Anytime the failover transport is used with more than one active broker, you can get clients connected to separate brokers. Even without randomize, consider that a loss of connection due to a network disconnect will cause the client to reconnect to a differen