Thanks Tim.
It's much better now. And it seems to work.
I'll be doing some tests with it for the next week.
There is however, a very annoying bug with the parallel Java functionality:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2283
So it's too soon to be happy ... :)
Thanks again.
Timothy
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 14:21 -0700, Eric Bouer wrote:
> Hello Jim
> Unfortunately I can't confirm it's working
> Using activemq:failover
> (discovery:multicast://default,tcp://activemqhost:61616)
> I've got :
> "Connect fail to 'discovery:multicast://default': Composite connection not
> supported
o:
Subject: Re: Discovery and NMS
Hello Jim
Unfortunately I can't confirm it's working
Using activemq:failover
(discovery:multicast://default,tcp://activemqhost:61616)
I've got :
"Connect fail to 'discovery:multicast://default': Composite connection not
support
Hello Jim
Unfortunately I can't confirm it's working
Using activemq:failover
(discovery:multicast://default,tcp://activemqhost:61616)
I've got :
"Connect fail to 'discovery:multicast://default': Composite connection not
supported with MulticastDiscovery transport."
Using activemq:discovery:mul
Hi Eric (And John West),
I haven't been able to get the auto-discovery to work yet, but from your
sample connection strings, I think you will need to change them to the
following to have any chance of getting them to work:
activemq:discovery:multicast://default
or
activemq:failover:discovery:m
Hi jim.
First I'd like to thank you for your work.
I guess you know that you can turn on auto-discovery and still make your
broker not join the store-and-forward network.
I just changed the multicast group name and brokers dont talk with each
other.
basically what I'm trying to do is to start my N
Hi Eric,
I have been trying to test whether discovery works, but I am not sure I have
things configured correctly. I usually turn off the auto-discovery on the
broker because we have so many in our development environment that they
start to cross-talk with each other and contaminate our tests. I'
There are some problems in its address parsing code that I am working on right
now. I have not been able to confirm anthing beyond that yet.
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: Eric Bouer
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:33:47
To:
Subject: Re: Discovery and NMS
Can anyone confirm it&#
Can anyone confirm it's working ?
Or any other information on discovery in NMS ?
semog wrote:
>
> I have not used the discovery code additions. Are there any unit test
> samples that use it that might give you an idea on the format? If there
> aren't, we should probably add some. You may wa
I have not used the discovery code additions. Are there any unit test
samples that use it that might give you an idea on the format? If there
aren't, we should probably add some. You may want to look around for a Java
sample. No guarantees, but it might give an indication on what the format
mi
10 matches
Mail list logo
