; Justin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "BN"
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 12:35:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Difference between ActiveMQ vs Apache ActiveMQ Artemis
>
> Thanks Gents for the posts.
> From what I gather are tw
ocol).
You asked about Fuse, but Fuse isn't an Apache project so I think you'd be
better off asking those guys on their own lists.
Justin
- Original Message -
From: "BN"
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 12:35:43 PM
Subject: Re: Dif
Thanks Gents for the posts.
>From what I gather are two points
1. If an organization is risk averse then they should stick to ActiveMQ
2. Artemis code base comes from HornetQ and so Artemis would be a natural
transition for people who are comfortable or have previous experience
working with Hornet
31:03 AM
Subject: Re: Difference between ActiveMQ vs Apache ActiveMQ Artemis
I won't try to detail the differences; someone who knows Artemis well
should do that. But one high-level difference is that Artemis implements
JMS 2.0 and ActiveMQ implements only 1.0.
One factor to consider is how
I won't try to detail the differences; someone who knows Artemis well
should do that. But one high-level difference is that Artemis implements
JMS 2.0 and ActiveMQ implements only 1.0.
One factor to consider is how risk-averse the organization is when choosing
software. Artemis achieved 1.0 stat
