@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re:
Artemis HA cluster with replication
Just to tie a bow on this...
Replication is designed to be used in production. However, whether or not
it is ready for your specific use-case is something only you can validate
with testing.
Justin
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:37 AM
Just to tie a bow on this...
Replication is designed to be used in production. However, whether or not
it is ready for your specific use-case is something only you can validate
with testing.
Justin
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:37 AM, praneethg
wrote:
> So can we go in to production using replica
I recommend you start a new thread about your issue rather than using a
thread which has been dormant for more than a year.
Justin
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:03 AM, rajkaur152 wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> I have a question. I want to configure cluster with "colocated"
> .
> I have 3 servers in a clus
Hi Justin,
I have a question. I want to configure cluster with "colocated" .
I have 3 servers in a cluster. can you suggest how it is achievable. I
cannot specify the group-name as suggested in official documentation to
allow servers in a particular group to act as backup.
--
Sent from: http://
I will hopefully get a chance to look at it at some point. Contributions
are, of course, always welcome.
Justin
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 12:07 PM, martk <123mar...@web.de> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Yes, that's exactly the same behavior. Thank you. Would be great to be
> fixed
> in one of the next
Hi Justin,
Yes, that's exactly the same behavior. Thank you. Would be great to be fixed
in one of the next releases.
@Clebert: I think that's the benefit: replication with nothing shared.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
I believe this has already been filed in JIRA [1].
Justin
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1285
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I am not so sure multiple backup would work with shared nothing.
> I have seen that working with shared storage.
>
> We co
I am not so sure multiple backup would work with shared nothing.
I have seen that working with shared storage.
We could work with you on that. I'm not sure what would take thought.
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 5:29 AM martk <123mar...@web.de> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am using Artemis 2.2.0 and HA w
ginal Message -
From: "怀守昆"
To: "users"
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 7:31:28 AM
Subject: 回复：Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication
Is Artemis replication asynchronously or synchronized ?
It's not very clear in user manual.
But in code replication packet is not send
主题：Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication
日期：2017年06月07日 21点53分
Performance over replication is only due to network latencies.
There is a wish at the moment. But I am not aware of planning yet. It will
happen but I don't know when yet.
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:51 AM praneethg
wrote:
> Are yo
So can we go in to production using replication ? want to make sure Artemis
is production ready , is any one using this in Production?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-HA-cluster-with-replication-tp4725734p4727161.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
Performance over replication is only due to network latencies.
There is a wish at the moment. But I am not aware of planning yet. It will
happen but I don't know when yet.
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:51 AM praneethg
wrote:
> Are you planning to include ZooKeeper integration pretty soon? Any
>
Are you planning to include ZooKeeper integration pretty soon? Any timeline?
And would that improve performance over replication?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-HA-cluster-with-replication-tp4725734p4727132.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User maili
Just create 3 pairs.. connected in clustering.
The other option would be to develop a manager with zoo keeper..
that's not currently supported. but we could work together if you're
interested. You will still need 3 nodes on zookeeper to manage your
broker.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:51 AM, martk
How do I have to set up the e.g. 4 nodes? One live (master) and 3 backup
(slave)? And would this solve the problem of two live broker (the steps to
reproduce are in first post)?
clebertsuconic wrote
> There isn't much we can do with a single backup pair.
>
> On this case you will need 3 pairs...
There isn't much we can do with a single backup pair.
On this case you will need 3 pairs...
or maybe you could embed zookeeper somehow. We had thought about using
zookeeper (which will require more than 3 nodes to elect quorum
anyways).
We can only guarantee that a single backup/live pair is no
No, I would like to simulate a busy/overloaded server (e.g. the broker
process is not working correctly). The network is all the time available and
the server is also answering a ping.
jbertram wrote
> I realize you're attempting to simulate a network outage, but from what I
> understand using SI
I realize you're attempting to simulate a network outage, but from what I
understand using SIGSTOP isn't necessarily an accurate way to do it. It was
explained to me awhile back by a colleague who had done quite a bit of work in
this area that SIGSTOP works differently at the socket level from s
k" <123mar...@web.de>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 11:49:45 PM
Subject: Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication
With master you are talking about the 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT?
How do I have to provide the address? Is the (current) entry in the
broker.xml (IP:PORT) enoug
With master you are talking about the 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT?
How do I have to provide the address? Is the (current) entry in the
broker.xml (IP:PORT) enough?
Shared storage is unfortunately no option (that is why trying to use
Artemis).
On Mon, May 15, 2017, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> that's how it shoul
>From which script are you talking about?
I am configuring and starting the EmbeddedJMS from a simple Main-class.
Maybe such a check could be triggered at that point?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-HA-cluster-with-replication-tp4725734p4725817.h
You could also contribute a change to the script to reboot the server
in case of JVM crash, that way client reconnects would work and you
would only need the network pinger in case of a real box crash.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> you need a network of brokers of at l
you need a network of brokers of at least 3 pairs to have quorum working fine.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 8:47 AM, martk <123mar...@web.de> wrote:
> Hi clebertsuconic,
>
> I have tested the network check by adding (on master with the SLAVEIP and on
> slave with the MASTERIP):
>
> 1
> 1000
> MASTER
Hi clebertsuconic,
I have tested the network check by adding (on master with the SLAVEIP and on
slave with the MASTERIP):
1
1000
MASTERIP/SLAVEIP
Using the described signals to test this does not work (which makes sense,
because the ping is working).
How many servers would I need for a grou
U need either a group of servers to establish quorums or u need the network
pinger.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:46 AM martk <123mar...@web.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using ActiveMQ Artemis 1.5.4 and configured a high available cluster
> (master/slave broker) with replication (using static connect
25 matches
Mail list logo
