Re: [Ext] Re: Re: Re: Artemis ClientID and shared topics

2024-09-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
of this e-mail is really necessary. > > > > > Von: "Robbie Gemmell" > An:users@activemq.apache.org > Datum:09.09.2024 18:42 > Betreff:[Ext] Re: Re: Re: Artemis ClientID and shared topics > -- &g

Antwort: [Ext] Re: Re: Re: Artemis ClientID and shared topics

2024-09-19 Thread Herbert . Helmstreit
:"Robbie Gemmell" An: users@activemq.apache.org Datum: 09.09.2024 18:42 Betreff:[Ext] Re: Re: Re: Artemis ClientID and shared topics JMS 1 says that the named durable subscriptions are ClientID-scoped, you needed a ClientID to use a named durable subscription (in pra

Re: [Ext] Re: Re: Artemis ClientID and shared topics

2024-09-09 Thread Robbie Gemmell
HRB 11256 Amtsgericht Dresden | USt.-ID DE 159 607 786 > Geschäftsführer: Manfred Austen, CEO und Dr. Ulf Martin, COO > > P Please check whether a printout of this e-mail is really necessary. > > > > > Von:"Robbie Gemmell" > An:users@acti

Antwort: [Ext] Re: Re: Artemis ClientID and shared topics

2024-09-09 Thread Herbert . Helmstreit
egards Herbert Von:"Robbie Gemmell" An: users@activemq.apache.org Datum: 09.09.2024 12:16 Betreff: [Ext] Re: Re: Artemis ClientID and shared topics JMS 2 essentially outlined that shared named subscriptions on Connections with a ClientID are still ClientID-scoped (i.

Re: Artemis ClientID and shared topics

2024-09-06 Thread Justin Bertram
> What has the clientID to do with shared topics anyway? The client ID, at least in part, forms the identity of the subscription. This is noted in section 8.3.2 of the JMS 2 specification which states: A shared non-durable subscription is identified by a name specified by the client and by th