Oh, I just saw that Michael Andre Pearce wrote the same information, but my
mail app didn't group his response into the conversation so I didn't see it
before responding. Sorry for the duplication.
Tim
On Sat, May 30, 2020, 6:33 AM Tim Bain wrote:
> JB,
>
>
> https://www.oracle.com/webfolder/te
JB,
https://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/java/JMS2SharedConsumer/JMS2SharedConsumer.html
describes the feature, and the OP is correct that ActiveMQ 5.x and Amazon
MQ do not support it directly since they do not support JMS 2.0.
However, 5.x supports equivalent functionality
: Amazon MQ share Hi,What do you mean by
shared durable subscribers ?ActiveMQ supports durable subscribers, so AmazonMQ
does as well.RegardsJB> Le 30 mai 2020 à 00:00, arjunsreepad
a écrit :> > We are using *Amazon MQ (5.15.10)* & PHP
for coding. > *My requirement is to hav
Hi,
What do you mean by shared durable subscribers ?
ActiveMQ supports durable subscribers, so AmazonMQ does as well.
Regards
JB
> Le 30 mai 2020 à 00:00, arjunsreepad a écrit :
>
> We are using *Amazon MQ (5.15.10)* & PHP for coding.
> *My requirement is to have shared durable subscribers.
Hi Trevor,
welcome aboard !!
Regards
JB
On 12/11/2017 11:24 PM, trevdyck wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am the product manager for Amazon MQ, and have just joined the list. We
are excited to support ActiveMQ as it has a vibrant developer community and
a large existing user base! The folks on this list
Hi everyone,
I am the product manager for Amazon MQ, and have just joined the list. We
are excited to support ActiveMQ as it has a vibrant developer community and
a large existing user base! The folks on this list have developed a great
product that we are happy to be a part of.
I will also say w
On 12/08/2017 11:33 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
Have you tried searching with bing?
given the context of the thread maybe it'd be better to ask Alexa ?
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Justin Bertram wrote:
You can imagine that such organizations who make tons of investment in
ActiveM
On 12/08/2017 10:39 AM, Justin Bertram wrote:
You can imagine that such organizations who make tons of investment in
ActiveMQ are not impressed by claims of 'better architecture' or my
'journaling system is faster'.
Do you have a list of what these companies are, in fact, impressed with? I
t
Have you tried searching with bing?
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Justin Bertram wrote:
> > You can imagine that such organizations who make tons of investment in
> ActiveMQ are not impressed by claims of 'better architecture' or my
> 'journaling system is faster'.
>
> Do you have a list of w
> You can imagine that such organizations who make tons of investment in
ActiveMQ are not impressed by claims of 'better architecture' or my
'journaling system is faster'.
Do you have a list of what these companies are, in fact, impressed with? I
tried to Google for it but it didn't turn up much.
What I know is exactly what I said: "effort was started part of the RH
partnership". I know very little about a partnership. The little I know
I cannot disclose and things change all the time anyway.
RH's strategy, like any other business is driven by sales. What I can
tell you for instance th
I'm not clear on what you're saying. Are you indicating that Amazon and
Red Hat are partnering on this venture for ActiveMQ 5.x in AWS?
Justin
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> I made some inquiries and have it on good authority that the AWS Managed
> ActiveMQ effort wa
I made some inquiries and have it on good authority that the AWS Managed
ActiveMQ effort was started part of the RH partnership [1]. So while the
community was not contacted, AWS did talk to people with ActiveMQ
expertise. Now I am surprised that the RH people on this list didn't
know about it
Sounds great, we appreciate that.
On Dec 4, 2017 3:32 AM, "khandelwalanuj"
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am planing to switch the in-house running ActiveMQ to the AWS provided
> one. I will keep this community informed about the experience in this and
> any issues around it. I will also be doing perfor
Hi All,
I am planing to switch the in-house running ActiveMQ to the AWS provided
one. I will keep this community informed about the experience in this and
any issues around it. I will also be doing performance testing.
Thanks,
Anuj
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-U
I saw that announcement as well and was a bit puzzled by the lack of any
involvement by Amazon in the community (at least that I could tell). That
is, of course, their prerogative.
Since it's so unclear at this point how this potentially new user-base
might impact the community I don't see how it
> This may complicate or
> delay the eventual sunsetting of 5.x in favor of Artemis; there may be
> interest in keeping 5.x alive for longer as a result of its use in this
> service.
no one ever had the intention to discontinue 5.x... (or sunsetting
like you said).
Look for instance at tomcat.. t
17 matches
Mail list logo
