Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-21 Thread Clebert Suconic
There was a lot of work in testing after 2.20. I highly recommend resina a recent version às Anton said. Clebert Suconic On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:17 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > I agree with Anton here 100%. > > Netty uses direct memory for performance reasons. If you disable it there > will

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-20 Thread Justin Bertram
I agree with Anton here 100%. Netty uses direct memory for performance reasons. If you disable it there will certainly be performance trade-offs. Whether that really impacts you depends on your use-case. Also, keep in mind that if Netty doesn't use direct memory it will use the JVM's heap instead

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-20 Thread Justin Bertram
In absolute terms AIO is faster than NIO. That's the whole reason we created the activemq-artemis-native integration layer. However, whether this difference actually impacts your deployment depends on whether disk writes are a bottleneck. Therefore, it's really impossible for us to answer this que

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-20 Thread Domenico Francesco Bruscino
Send a blank email to users-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org to unsubscribe from ActiveMQ Users mailing list, for further details see https://activemq.apache.org/contact On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 11:15, 23F3000346 NASHEETA FARZANA < 23f3000...@ds.study.iitm.ac.in> wrote: > Please unsubscribe me from

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-20 Thread 23F3000346 NASHEETA FARZANA
Please unsubscribe me from this mailing list On Thu, 20 Feb, 2025, 3:15 pm Anton Roskvist, wrote: > Sorry, but to my knowledge that is almost impossible to say for sure, as > it's highly dependent on your specific use case and setup. As before > though, if you can safely try it out, it might hel

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-20 Thread Anton Roskvist
Sorry, but to my knowledge that is almost impossible to say for sure, as it's highly dependent on your specific use case and setup. As before though, if you can safely try it out, it might help in narrowing down the source of the issue. I'd really like to reiterate that version upgrades to any p

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-20 Thread Franck Malka
Ok, In case the problem is direct memory Do you think disable netty direct memory would have a serious impact on performance? E.g. -Dio.netty.noPreferDirect=true -Dio.netty.maxDirectMemory=0 -Dio.netty.allocator.type=unpooled On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 10:47 AM Anton Roskvist wrote: > Hi, > > I thi

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-20 Thread Anton Roskvist
Hi, I think the point would be that if possible, the idea would be to try the same conditions against a more recent version of the broker. All else being equal, this would rule out any and all issues that might already have been addressed in the roughly 3000 commits since 2.14.0. Same could app

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-19 Thread Franck Malka
Hi, Yes, I use ASYNCIO and libAIO. I have seen performance is better than NIO. You think I can achieve the same performance with NIO? Do you think I can disable netty direct memory? -Franck. On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 8:05 AM Justin Bertram wrote: > It's really impossible to say whether or not th

Re: ActiveMq 2.14.0 Native Memory Leak

2025-02-19 Thread Justin Bertram
It's really impossible to say whether or not this is some kind of memory leak which might be fixed in a later release. However, I do know that 2.14.0 was released over 4 years ago now and there's been almost 3,000 commits between then and 2.39.0 (i.e. the current release). Regarding the specifics