Tim,
Are you aware of ActiveMQ moving towards using a bulkhead pattern?
Thank you.
Vince
On 7/28/21, 10:53 AM, "Vince Cox" wrote:
Tim,
Since they have experienced such an issue with leader election, they are
requesting implementing a bulk head pattern to increase the resiliency of
Tim,
Since they have experienced such an issue with leader election, they are
requesting implementing a bulk head pattern to increase the resiliency of
ActiveMQ
Vince
On 7/12/21, 10:27 AM, "Vince Cox" wrote:
Tim,
I understand your point of view completely. I have a customer that ru
Vince,
Both the jdbcPersistenceAdapter and the leaseDatabaseLocker appear to
accept a dataSource parameter. I wasn't clear from your original question
whether you were using two different dataSource objects (each one pointing
to a different Oracle database). Your first sentence sounded like you we
Vince,
Thanks for explaining the use case. I'm surprised to hear that moderate
load is enough to make the lock table inaccessible, and it makes me
question whether they have Oracle properly configured and on adequately
sized hardware, but that's a separate question, for them to resolve if they
cho
Tim,
I understand your point of view completely. I have a customer that runs Oracle.
When they have moderate traffic they experience a failover event between the
Master/Slave. And it appears to come from an inability to access the lock in
time causing the slave to take over. When they first cam
To confirm, are you saying that you're trying to use one Oracle database
for message storage and a different Oracle database for locking?
If so, would you mind explaining why you're not just using a single
database for both purposes? I have no idea if the configuration I think
you're describing is
