Re: ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

2017-04-26 Thread Tim Bain
I interpret that document to be written in the context of a requirement that the broker not lose persistent messages in the event of a restart or failover, since those are the requirements of most ActiveMQ users using a persistence store. (Typically, either you need 100% persistence and you use a p

Re: ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

2017-04-26 Thread Martyn Taylor
My answer was based on ActiveMQ Artemis. Sorry for the confusion. On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:56 PM, khandelwalanuj < anuj.cool.khandel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes I was talking about ActiveMQ 5.x > > Can you also clarify about the first point where it says that journaled > JDBC > store is incompat

Re: ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

2017-04-26 Thread khandelwalanuj
Yes I was talking about ActiveMQ 5.x Can you also clarify about the first point where it says that journaled JDBC store is incompatible with the JDBC master/slave. What does it exactly mean ? Link which says this: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Fuse_Message_Broker/5.4/html/Clusterin

Re: ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

2017-04-26 Thread Tim Bain
Anuj and Martyn, were your question and your answer about ActiveMQ 5.x or Artemis? I think the question was about 5.x and Martyn's answer was about Artemis. If so, see a 5.x response below. I don't believe that there is any reason other than the potential for message loss that you described (corre

Re: ActiveMQ JDBC with journaling enabled

2017-04-26 Thread Martyn Taylor
Hi On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:51 AM, khandelwalanuj < anuj.cool.khandel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was evaluating ActiveMQ's JDBC based persistent store with journaling > enabled. Have couple of doubts: > > 1. I was reading > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Fuse_ > Message_Brok