Re: ActiveMQ Clustering Issue

2012-08-23 Thread Timothy Bish
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 23:49 -0700, joesan wrote: > This is how my MessageListener looks like: > > *public class Listener implements MessageListener { > > public void onMessage(Message message) { > try { > MapMessage map = (MapMessage)message; >

Re: ActiveMQ Clustering Issue

2012-08-22 Thread joesan
This is how my MessageListener looks like: *public class Listener implements MessageListener { public void onMessage(Message message) { try { MapMessage map = (MapMessage)message; Long msgCount = map.getLong("counter");

Re: ActiveMQ Clustering Issue

2012-08-22 Thread joesan
Below is how my Consumer looks like: *public class Consumer { private static String brokerURL = "failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://localhost:61617)?maxReconnectAttempts=-1"; private static transient ConnectionFactory factory; private transient Connection connection; private tr

Re: ActiveMQ Clustering Issue

2012-08-22 Thread joesan
Well as per the docs, it is so! http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html maxReconnectAttempts=-1 will try indefinitely! I will try that tomorrow on my cluster configuration and let know the results here! Thanks for all the help! -- View this message in context: http://act

Re: ActiveMQ Clustering Issue

2012-08-22 Thread joesan
I would try increasing the maxReconnectAttempts to a bigger value. Is there a rule of thumb as to how big this should be? Is there an indefinite try? what happens if I specify -1? Will it try indefinitely until it gets a connection? I would love to have that! -- View this message in context: ht

Re: ActiveMQ Clustering Issue

2012-08-22 Thread Chris Pratt
At least from what I'm seeing in *ActiveMQ in Action*, that looks right. Could it be that your maxRecoveryAttempts=1 is preventing it from recovering the second time? (I'm fairly new to this myself) (*Chris*) On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:32 AM, joesan wrote: > I'm happy to see some help at las

Re: ActiveMQ Clustering Issue

2012-08-22 Thread joesan
I'm happy to see some help at last. Here is how the fail-over url looks like from my clients (both producer and consumer) failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://localhost:61617) -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Clustering-Issue-tp4655306p4655440.

Re: ActiveMQ Clustering Issue

2012-08-22 Thread Chris Pratt
What is the connection URL you are using on your clients? (*Chris*) On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:16 AM, joesan wrote: > Any help friends? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Clustering-Issue-tp4655306p4655410.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ -

Re: ActiveMQ Clustering Issue

2012-08-22 Thread joesan
What is more troubling me is that the messages sent by the Producer to a Topic is lost when the Master goes down. When I restart my consumer, all those messages that the Producer had sent to the Topic was lost. How do I handle this? Where is the high availability in picture in this AMQ Clustering?